ARA
ARA
ARA Home Contact Us

Mountain View, CA Home

Failure Analysis and Prevention

Structural Analysis and Design

Crashworthiness and Transportation Safety

Composite Materials

Expert Witness Services

Computational Fluid Dynamics

Center of Excellence in FE Crash Analysis

Indian Railway Passenger Coach Crashworthiness

World Trade Center

World Trade Center-7 Progressive Collapse

Analysis Light Rail Vehicle Crash Energy Management

Nondestructive Testing of Materials and Structures

Biomedical Analyses and Design

showcase

Ford Crown Victoria Crash Simulation

The The Silicon Valley Office of ARA has developed a high fidelity model of a Ford Crown Victoria for performing crashworthiness simulations. This study was part of an overall program sponsored by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to develop a set of crash models for various vehicles that represent the full range of vehicle types currently on the road. This set of vehicle models can be used to establish the crash safety of future light-weight vehicles developed under the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles (PNGV) program.

The overall program to develop and validate a high-fidelity crash simulation model for the Ford Crown Victoria was a combined experimental and modeling effort under the management of the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (VNTSC). MGA Research Corporation performed component validation tests on the Crown Victoria and had previously performed vehicle frontal and side impact tests. Results of the vehicle tests are shown on the Crown Victoria Crash Test Video page. Component tests for this program included thefront bumper rigid pole impact test, thefront door rigid pole impact test, and the vehicle frame rigid wall impact test.

The preliminary phase in the development of a crash simulation model was the vehicle tear-down and measurement of the structural geometries. An illustration of the Crown Victoria in this tear-down process is shown in Figure 1. Once the nonstructural components were removed from the vehicle, tape was applied to the components to discretize the structure prior to measurement. An illustration of the Crown Victoria with the exterior surfaces discretized is shown in Figure 2. The resulting measured surfaces were then modified to an appropriate format for use in the vehicle model mesh generation program TrueGrid. External surfaces, as seen in TrueGrid, are shown in Figure 3. These digitized surfaces were then used to generate the vehicle components in the finite element model. The corresponding FE model is shown in Figure 4.

Full vehicle crash test data was available for the Ford Crown Victoria from testing performed under the New Car Assessment Program (NCAP). This testing included both frontal barrier and side impact testing. The NCAP frontal impact test was simulated with the full vehicle model using the LS-DYNA finite element code. This frontal impact condition was a 15.6 m/s (35 mph) impact of the vehicle into a rigid wall. The calculated vehicle response in the frontal impact simulation is shown in Figure 5. Many of the characteristics observed in the tests were reproduced in the simulation. The overall collision response produces a forward pitching motion of the vehicle with a noticeable downward motion forward of the passenger compartment and a lifting of the rear of the vehicle. The hood was folded upward in the middle and the deformations were limited in the vehicle behind the firewall. This vehicle frontal crash behavior can be seen clearly in Movie 1.

The calculated and measured wall impact force histories, for the NCAP frontal impact test, are compared in Figure 6(a). The magnitude and time of the peak forces agree quite well. The maximum impact force occurs at a time of approximately 55 ms and corresponds to the time the engine is directly loaded through the crushed forward vehicle components against the wall. The late time impact force history drops off more rapidly in the simulation than in the experiment. This discrepancy may result from additional mass in the test, such as crash dummies and instrumentation that were not included in the current simulation. The calculated and measured engine longitudinal accelerations are compared in Figure 6(b). The magnitude of the calculated peak acceleration is approximately 30 percent higher than that in the test with a shorter pulse width. Additional analysis is required to determine the source of these discrepancies. The calculated response also has a larger magnitude cyclic response during the first 20 ms, which could be an artifact of the engine mount modeling.

The NCAP side impact test was simulated with the full vehicle model and a model created for the Movable Deformable Barrier (MDB). (Note: this model of the MDB was not independently validated.) The side impact test was a 14.9 m/s (33.25 mph) impact of the MDB into the stationary vehicle side. The wheels of the MDB were angled at 27 degrees relative to its axis to represent the relative motion of the two vehicles. The calculated vehicle response in the side impact simulation is shown in Movie 2 and Movie 3. Many of the characteristics observed in the tests were reproduced in the simulation. The overall crush of both the MDB front and the vehicle side compare reasonably well with the test. The gross motions of both the MDB and struck vehicle were also reasonably well calculated.

Comparisons of the calculated and measured MDB accelerations are shown in
Figure 7. The magnitude of the longitudinal acceleration is slightly over predicted in the simulation. This may be a result of either the car or the crushable MDB models being slightly too stiff.

References

  • S.W. Kirkpatrick, "Development and Validation of High Fidelity Vehicle Crash Simulation Models," SAE Publications, Presented at the 2000 International Congress and Exposition, March, 2000, SAE Paper No. 00PC-248.
    Abstract
    Evaluation
  • S.W. Kirkpatrick, J.W. Simons, and T.H. Antoun, 1998, "Development and Validation of High Fidelity Vehicle Crash Simulation Models," Int. J. Crashworthiness, International Crashworthiness Conference
    Abstract Evaluation

lsdyna

LS-DYNA - General Purpose Transient Dynamics Finite Element Program.

For inquiries or comments, please contact:
Dr. Steven Kirkpatrick
Principal Engineer
e-mail: skirkpatrick@ara.com

Dr. Robert T. Bocchieri
Principal Engineer
e-mail: rbocchieri@ara.com

 

civic

Figure 1-Vehicle Tear-Down Process
Initial Phase of Digitization.

civic
Figure 2- Vehicle Discretization
Phase II of Digitization
civic

Figure 3-Vehicle Discretization
Phase III of Digitization

civic

Figure 4-Crown Victoria Model Development


NCAP Frontal Impact Simulation

Figure 5- NCAP Frontal Impact Simulation Calculated Vehicle Deformation


NCAP Frontal Impact Simulation

Figure 6 - NCAP Frontal Impact Simulation Vehicle Collision Measures

NCAP Frontal Impact Simulation

Figure 7- NCAP Frontal Impact Simulation MDB Accelerations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FooterSite Map Contact

Applied Research Associates, Inc. • 4300 San Mateo Blvd. NE • Suite A-220 • Albuquerque, NM 87110 • Ph. 505.881.8074 Fax 505.883.3673 • email info@ara.com
Note: Applied Research Associates, Inc. does not offer engineering services in the State of North Carolina.
Please contact Applied Research Associates of North Carolina, P.C. to inquire about engineering services in this state. (919) 876-6018

Contac Us Site Map